If \(f\) changes by a small amount \(\dd{f}\) and \(g\) changes by a small amount \(\dd{g}\text{,}\) we should expect the linearity properties to hold:
Derivative of \(x^2\) can be done by visualizing a square of side length \(x\) and seeing how the area changes as \(x\) changes. You get two rectangles of area \(x\dd{x}\) and a small square of area \((\dd{x})^2\text{,}\) which is ‘negligible’, so the total change in area is approximately \(2x\dd{x}\text{,}\) and we imagine that if the change were infinitesimal, the change in area would be exactly \(2x\dd{x}\text{.}\)
We’ll make this sense of ‘negligibility’ much more precise later when we introduce limits, but for now, we can just rely on intuition and the idea that if \(\dd{x}\) is very small, then \((\dd{x})^2\) is even smaller and can be ignored.
Same thing can be done with \(x^3\text{,}\) by visualizing a cube of side length \(x\) and seeing how the volume changes as \(x\) changes. You get three rectangular boxes of volume \(x^2\dd{x}\) and three rectangular boxes of volume \(x(\dd{x})^2\) and a small cube of volume \((\dd{x})^3\text{.}\) The higher powers of \(\dd{x}\) are ‘negligible’, so the total change in volume is approximately \(3x^2\dd{x}\text{,}\) and we imagine that if the change were infinitesimal, the change in volume would be exactly \(3x^2\dd{x}\text{.}\)
so \(L'(50)=0.0068\cdot 50 + 0.15=0.49\text{,}\) which is the same as the slope of the tangent line we found last section. But it’s much more direct and efficient.